In Tough Economic Times You Should Avoid Making These 3 Critical Mistakes

Posted by naharazizi on Friday, October 28, 2011



Uncertainty dominates most people's minds. Staying positive in the current environment does not mean you have to stop listening to the news. Staying positive means you have to accept the new reality and to transform both their and your company access to business in the most difficult period since the Great Depression.

If you study the recent history, you will find that many companies not only survived the Great Depression, but actually improved during this period. You'll also learn that a key part of the success of companies that have survived and thrived is found in the way they communicate with all our stakeholders - employees, customers, shareholders, bankers, regulators, partners, etc.

During difficult times, the importance of accurate, targeted communication is enhanced. Bearing in mind that bargaining is nothing more than a specialized form of communication, knowledge of the negotiations is in the process, but an event that takes place when formal sit across the table to discuss the conditions of contract opens up a profound opportunity for you to not only protect the values​​, but actually create additional value within the company.

You and your company should avoid making any of the following three major errors in these negotiations are trying economic times.

1 Lowering your aspirations

Companies and people who thrived during the recent recession has focused on moving forward, regardless of market conditions. Do not make the mistake of lowering your aspirations as a result of what is happening around you. Success requires your full attention and requires ambitious goals -. And even more in tough economic times

Remember you do not negotiate with yourself. Do not make the mistake of lowering your aspirations, because you think that your colleagues will not be entertained by the level of its opening. Give your colleagues the opportunity to say no. Of course, you should be willing to make concessions if they say it does its job offer and it means you have to prepare the concession strategy where you have a clear picture of all the items you're willing to trade.

2 Using only a competitive strategy to negotiate or renegotiate the supply contracts

Do not make the mistake of thinking that a competitive approach to negotiation, where you are only interested in achieving their goals will result in the best deal for you. In tough times, vendors expect you to drive harder bargain and they will prepare a defense against a very assertive approach. Very often, their defense will underperform or just perform normally during the contract phase to ensure that you maximize the profits from the transactions. And during the phase of contract management professional buyers usually are not involved in managing relationships with suppliers, leaving open the possibility of arbitration.

During difficult times it becomes much more important to pursue more collaborative approach, where they also try to serve and meet some of the key medium and long term interests of its suppliers, not just focusing on their goals. You'll be surprised how creative suppliers can be if you feel that there is a trust in place and they are able to openly explore the creative possibilities with you.

Do not forget that you are far more likely to make concessions to people they like and trust than those who treat you with prezirom.Univerzalno the principle of reciprocity is alive and well in difficult times, -. Which means we go back to another form of behavior that indicate to us

So, go ahead, set the tone for cooperation relationships that you have with your key / strategic suppliers.

3 Neglecting to create organizational capability negotiation

Tough trading conditions provide an ideal opportunity and incentive to rethink the way you and your company dealing with suppliers, customers and other key stakeholders. Do not make the mistake of thinking that is a good negotiating skills are only found in individuals.

There are things you can do with relatively little effort to ensure that the results of your department, division or business negotiation efforts are equally enhanced by ensuring the application of business negotiations, best practices in accordance with the sale, purchase or other business processes your business environment.

To help you create the organizational skills of negotiation, I have created a review consists of 11 questions. After answering the 11 questions, you will immediately receive reports contrasting their responses to hundreds of answers to our database. Moreover, you will receive detailed recommendations based on your answers to help you create an organizational negotiation skills that will steady the ship in difficult times.

Bankruptcy Can Be An Economic Stimulus For Those In Serious Debt

Posted by naharazizi



During the past few years, most Americans have heard all the rescue that banks are getting. Even going further than that the federal government came up with a stimulus package that would supposedly stimulate the economy, but it was all give money to large corporations for their pet projects without creating any jobs at all. Right now, in 2011, the United States still has an employment rate of 9.2% of the country. It does not look like the economic stimulus did nothing for the citizens of the United States. Most Americans are buried under the mountain of credit card debt, waiting for a job, so you do not have to file for bankruptcy. In most cases, if these individuals have to wait too long, filing for bankruptcy will not help.

When it comes to debt, the statistics speak for themselves, the average American household $ 20,000 in credit card debt. That's a lot of money when you consider that $ 20,000 was also six months salary of the average American household. Most people do not realize that they will probably never be able to pay down debt. With interest rates up to about 21 to 26% for credit cards, people in this situation usually barely the minimum payment. This is why filing bankruptcy may be the only economic incentives that these people will ever get. The federal government does not say much, but when it comes down to it you do not pay their bills.

This is just common sense to look at your finances and see if you win the lottery you'll never be able to pay off. All you have to do is write down all your bills to create a budget and figure if ever charged on credit card never how long it will take you to pay them. If more than six years, the odds are against you. When you are facing such a situation it is time to go talk to a bankruptcy lawyer if bankruptcy can help your current situation.

There are two main chapters of bankruptcy for individuals. These are Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Chapter 7 bankruptcy is the most common and the king for an individual or family that has a large amount of unsecured debt such as credit cards, medical bills and payday loans. Filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy will wipe out all those debts if the debtor has no secured debt there is a possibility that will emerge from bankruptcy is debt free. That sounds like a pretty good incentive package if you ask me. On the other side of the fence, Chapter 13 bankruptcy is best for people who are trying to protect their property from being lost in foreclosure. In Chapter 13, the debtor has its own bankruptcy attorney draw up a repayment plan that will last 3-5 godina.Poglavlje 13 payment plan based on the amount that the borrower can afford the secured debts are paid and all other paid if something is left preko.Poglavlje 13 bankruptcy allows the debtor to his property, and getting caught up on back payments.

nice thing about is a bankruptcy attorney file a petition with the court, the creditors can not bother the debtor to collect the amount owed. People who are struggling paycheck to paycheck and in many cases unemployment check unemployment check to get, I do not need extra pressure nasty creditors humiliating them. Do not wait for economic stimulus from the government to save you, bankruptcy may be the only incentive you will ever get.

How Small Wholesale Businesses Are Essential for Economic Growth

Posted by naharazizi



What is really driving our economy? The answer is --- a small wholesale company. How important are they? They are vital for economic growth, due to many reasons such as: small wholesale companies to increase per capita income and national GDP, which are the main indicators of economic growth. Most people can not accept this and believe that a large enterprise and wholesale point of production plants are actually the most important factor for economic development of the country. If you think deeply through small wholesalers and the number of people who benefit from it, only then you will see what we saw. Minus a small wholesale company of the economic setting of the country and be prepared to witness the scale of unemployment rising to a shocking extent.

Small businesses actually stabilize the economy of the country, and rightly win the title of the country's "economic backbone". Notwithstanding the fact that they do not offer transport millions of pounds, investors around the world trust the small wholesale companies more than in larger instruments. These companies are really flexible and easy to manage in a changing economic conditions.

to create more employment opportunities!

The people of this industry can support a small wholesale companies play a significant role in creating new jobs. One study showed that small businesses generate 20% of new jobs each year. Statistics show that small businesses tend to fall less during the economic crisis. Remain robust in the most severe recession includes extremely stable

more jobs for uneducated people!

large wholesale company mainly engaged on an international level, and should be recognized experts in education is laudable, while small companies generally deal with the large local so that people with low education profile to get a job there. Half of the working people in the country are usually part of the wholesale business. There are many assumptions to produce semi-finished and not so high-tech equipment. Therefore, such a preferred hiring less skilled people who can do more work in less time and at low wages.

to improve the standard of living!

Consider the example of China, there are innumerable small wholesale company, commonly referred to as homemade. These manufacturers deal at the local level, with less than 100 (not highly skilled) employees primarily engaged in wholesale semi-finished goods. Such opportunities to create good profits for all of them and increase your overall income per capita in the country, which is a prominent indicator of economic growth. Increased profits also improves living standards and creating a good state influence at the international level.

mobilize the cash!

Although most small manufacturing companies depend on their work outsourced to other manufacturers, but in fact they form the base of large enterprises. These companies produce more products and help circulate more money. Smaller manufacturing enterprises are formed during periods of recession, it is perhaps because there was nothing else to do separately. People are using their savings and started a small wholesale at Community level. There are several wholesale niches that do not require a large amount to start. Small businesses help to mobilize cash, and most of the startups actually remain stable.

The Obama's Administration's Economic Failure

Posted by naharazizi



If all this is to create economic growth was to spend billions and billions of Federal Reserve printing dollars, economic growth would be "no brainer". We would do exactly what Obama administration has done and everything will be dobro.Činjenica economic growth requires more than just spending money and printing money.

It requires an investment of money, reinvesting the profits it made​​, and repeated this process over and over again. This is called the "multiplier effect". By-products are a good investment: new products, efficiency in developing and manufacturing products, services and jobs. To date, there is no evidence that any money spent by the Obama administration has failed in any meaningful way to produce any of the above effects in the economy, despite administration claims that we can stop the decline and loss of jobs.

The Obama administration is trying its inappropriate way that the government try to do what the private sector is not the best, invest and do profit.Uprave plan doomed to fail because their goal has now become to make a profit. To do this, the government must become a competitor in the market, instead of the regulator on the market. It's as if the referee in the game to bet on a team that wants to win before the match referees. He will do his best to make sure that the interest in winning the igri.Vlada backed General Motors may cut prices of its cars to the point that they can cause competitors go out of business, and we then get a company car instead of three in the U.S. u. That would mean fewer jobs and more expensive cars of inferior quality.

Management must understand that this country is a competitor on the world market for businesses. It is necessary to attract business in this country, and not chase them away with high income taxes and excessive regulation. Corporations are what make the economy grow, not the government. Corporations are experts in investing, making a profit and reinvestment. And if the corporation does not do it well, it will go out of business -. And deservedly so

Obama administration gets "F" in ekonomiji.Trenutne policy will not cause economic growth. Instead, they will cause inflation. This inflation will initially appear as a growth, but in reality, it will only be new printed dollars into the market.

Printing money without economic growth has the effect of currently available goods and services seem to be worth more. We saw the first effects of inflation with the dollar losing one third of its value in the last six months. The reasons we have not seen a sharper decline of the dollar so far, 1) the economy is still relatively strong, despite the down turn, and 2) administration only began to spend billions of dollars have been allocated.

administration to reverse its course with regard to economic policy. This should reduce consumption, reduce corporate taxes and stop printing money. Cutting spending will help reduce debt. Cutting taxes will attract business to come to America. It is not printing money will allow the dollar to strengthen and lead to more investment dollars to reach the United States.

Truth About Global Economic Crisis: Book Review

Posted by naharazizi on Monday, October 24, 2011



You want to read the global economic crisis since the Great Depression of XXI Century, edited by Michel Chossudovsky and Andrew Gavin Marshall, if you meet these criteria: you information and analysis on critical issues that come from great thinkers outside the mainstream media and the publishing world, you can handle brain pain from detailed and brutally honest revelations, you are willing and able to challenge their prejudices and preconceptions that the new explanation of how the world actually works

.

If millions of Americans to read this book, we would probably see a much stronger rebellion against the political establishment who declined severely punished guilty of countless people in the financial, banking and mortgage sector, which has brought a number of U.S. and global economic system.

This book ties together a number of factors in twenty chapters that reveal how the world has become corrupted, because the power of plutocratic, wealthy and corporate interests. From Wall Street corporate apartments for the Federal Reserve and other central banks to U.S. military and NATO, a lot or get woven into the tapestry of disturbing crimes against society, which have not yet been processed.

This book is truly an instrument of anti-brainwashing. If you're willing to spend serious time reading, then you will become much angrier about the dismal state of the economy that is causing so much pain and suffering of ordinary people around the world. If you have personally avoided the worst of the destruction of the economic meltdown, then you'll have a lot more compassion for those who are severely affected.

In all honesty, if the current global economic crisis you angry, pessimistic, fearful, paranoid, desperate and even worse, then this book will most likely exacerbate all such feelings. Revealing more connections, implications and causes, this book will motivate you to do everything you can to combat corporate, plutocratic forces devastating the lives of ordinary people. If you already have little trust in government, it will only make things worse. Does all this mean that you should avoid reading? Absolutely not.

Here are some statements from the book that resonated with me and you can use to decide whether the general philosophical orientation is compatible with your opinion:

"Wall Street's ponzi scheme is used to manipulate the market and transfer billions of dollars into the pockets of banksters ."

"The government rescue packages around the world are corporate in nature, such as saving the capitalists at the expense of people ."

"global political economy is transformed into a global government structure at the crossroads of major financial crises ."

Just gin up the courage to read it, get some color markers to highlight passages and expand your knowledge to overcome all the propaganda constantly throws at you. We need more citizen unrest on the energy of several public protests to overthrow the powers that have corrupted and perverted our vlade.Ključni voice in mainstream media, which is in line with the painful messages in this book is Dylan Ratigan who is a great Daily Show on MSNBC. He also should read this book timely.

Economic Bubbles 101

Posted by naharazizi



all too common phrase "learning from history" between the rhetoric of governments and central banks for decades. And since we've heard most of our lives we think that today's economic events will have terrible consequences of past mistakes. So is the case with the infamous property bubble that is our economy experienced almost every decade in our lives. What puzzles me is the fact that the academic macro-economists always debate whether the central bank only needs to prick bubbles or a run out of steam on its own instead of focusing on how to avoid them.

As many of the diseases are the result of individual lives - and in many cases can be prevented - the law of cause and effect applies to the economic bubble of the event. For example, the Real Estate Bubble that we experienced during the early 2000s was not "just happen." Something is causing a bubble that eventually brought us the current financial crisis. From the Austrian school perspective, there is no logical explanation of how man-made economy (Keynesian-ISM) bubbles form and why it allows to operate a free market would be prevented.

The demand for loans

When the economy is experiencing high demand for credit, due to the high demand for scarce resources. As a result of lack of market entrepreneurs to participate in the production of these resources by creating investment boom. Without the intervention of central banks - in a truly free market - high demand for credit will be reflected in an increase in interest rates u. This is part of the economic laws of supply and demand. When the goods, for example, is in short supply with high demand commodity prices going gore.Isti law applies to a loan request when the loan is limited - because of the limited savings -. And the demand is high, the price of the loan or have to go up

cost of credit expressed in interest rates

So, what happens if the cost of the loan is suppressed by the central banks? Clearly, the investment boom does not stop. First of all, it gives the wrong signals to business people as well as in the previous example, the builders will be built over. This results in the arena of the other players / participants that May is not necessarily equipped to handle credit and / or business requirements - new home builder and the marginal buyer. In Austrian economic terms, which are called "malinvestments." Malinvestments are investments that the free market - an unprecedented government and central bank intervention - not nastupiti.Podrijetlo word "mal" comes from the Latin word "malus". Its meaning is "bad" or "insufficient ."

If the central bank would fix the price of interest rates - such as Alan Greenspan is not the time Real Estate Boom - the market would be adjusted so as rates go up. As a result of increasing interest rates at least two events would have occurred. 1) Malinvestments would be prevented, and 2) the asset price would be inflated. In our example, housing prices would not have gone so quickly and toliko.Cijena assets - real estate - would be kept in check by the market. Of course, things have not happened this way. The central bank has adopted a man-made basis so that the economy keeping rates at low levels, leading to malinvestments and artificially inflated property values​​. Therefore, no natural growth rates, control rates for inflation to be directed to the property itself.

credit expansion performed by the central bank before and during the events of the so-called "economic boom" that can temporarily create the illusion that there is more real resources available than actually exists. Moreover, it seems many people feel when they are rich overview of their net worth, in terms of valuation of assets. In reality, the effects of the Bubble, no doubt, painful burst. There is no such thing as a soft landing when it comes to economic bubbles,. Must be prevented by the government and central bank allowing the market to adjust freely, without their intervention

Lessons from the Great Depression

of the Great Depression in the 1930s was the impact of a number of basic events that have occurred. First, it was the 1929 Stock Market crash, which is driven by credit expansion that led to artificially inflated share prices. Credit expansion has always been inspired by the joint efforts of central banks and governments. If rates were allowed to adjust freely - without the intervention of central banks - malinvestments to prevent and shareholder value would be maintained at the value dictated by the free market. Many Americans are exuberant their new found wealth in the stock market. As (more) young people act like they are invincible, so many "new rich" individuals and businesses. Second, when the explosion shares Bubble, instead of allowing "too big to fail" entities fail politicians decided to save them. Thus, more government intervention in the form of regulations, taxation and saving. People have lost their stock investments and bank savings. Bank runs occurred because the bank only kept some of their deposits in their vaults - Fractional reserve banking system that is used today - while the rest was lost due loans are secured by shares. I see many similarities between the events of yesterday and today. Briefly here are:

1 Credit expansion promoted by the central banks;
Second The emergence Malinvestments;
Third Asset bubbles;
4th Bubble burst;
5th "Too big to fail" corporations are saved by rescue;
6th Asset deflation;
7th Government enforcement of new regulations;
8th Keynesian principles that are applied causing more money to print;
9th Stagflation - our current economic phase - in which commodity prices go up, and the value of assets - like real estate -. Continue to blow

Finally, if central banks, governments, politicians, economists and modern really would stand by the motto "learning from history, so it does not happen again," they will do well to pick up a few books of Austrian economists such as Mises, Rothbard, Hayek, and Hazlitt.

China - US Economic Relations

Posted by naharazizi



Introduction
It is an attempt to look at the economic aspect of the U.S. - China relations from the Chinese perspective. This approach can provide interesting insights into the most important economic axis of economic interdependence in the modern world, and generate innovative ideas on how to access the existing and future problems.

Theoretical background
The modern phase of US-Chinese relations are characterized by a high degree of economic interdependence can be analyzed from a realist perspective. Henry Kissinger was working towards a classic "realist" balance of power arrangements seeking closer relations with China to counter Soviet influence in Asia after the Vietnam War. The Dr. Kissinger to Nixon's own words are "had ideas for building peace on a global scale." Therefore, it might be argued from a constructivist perspective that this is a classic 'realist' foreign policy act created a reality that will develop into a major phenomenon of modern economic policy interdependence between the world's leading liberal free market democracy, and specifically the last communist države.Impresivan increase economic exchanges between the two countries, the reforms introduced by Deng Xiaoping in 1979 led to the current situation in which they dominate world trade and global economic stability depends on the successful razvoju.Upravljanje these relationships and mutual political and security implications require skilled economic statecraft to solve problems related to stem from unmatched extent of economic interdependence and structural differences between the communist rule of the economies in transition to a free market in the case of China and the economy is in transition from "laissez-faire" principles of the Reagan era of increasing calls for more regulation, after the global financial crisis 2008th

historical context
The relationship between the U.S. and China began to develop uu new direction, after Henry Kissinger approached the economic relations between China and picked up especially after the reforms Deng Xio Ping in 1979. Trade with the United States has helped China achieve dramatic success in improving quality of life of the most populous country in the world. Chinese political life is advanced by more openness, democracy and accountability and the protection of private property is a chance for a prosperous middle class to emerge. At the same time China is still a communist country ruled by the Communist Party, which is far from even the concept of something similar to Gorbachev's perestroika, let alone more comprehensive political reformi.Izvanredan economic development was accompanied by extensive environmental damage. Some of the new rich have earned their wealth through corruption and lack of an effective justice system to solve the problem is partly due to CCP's political opposition reformi.Sredstava for the life of a large portion of the population, although better than the starving population of sub-Saharan Africa is still uncertain near the border siromaštva.Gospodarskog development based on cheap labor and still show signs of success in the more technologically advanced areas such as Japan and the Asian tigers have done.
The U.S. approach to China is in the range from a desire to ensure good relations to alleviate the security threats in the 70's through the early period of growth of economic relations that began with the Deng reforms and culminated in China receive a first place among U.S. trading partners and the world wide importance of water in the U.S. uncertainty of how to treat China: as a rival, an ally of controversial or difficult partner to deal with, but it is impossible to refuse.
Floating exchange for Chinese currency rage.

The Chinese government has strongly resisted international pressure led the U.S. to float the Chinese valute.Kinezi complain that now after the financial crisis is not a problem rate of its currency, but the value of the dollar, or more accurate values​​, but the stability of the dollar which is dependent on stability of American politike.Iznad conclusion Wang Qing, an economist from Morgan Stanley in Hong Kong to the U.S. government responsible for the course linking their stability to the stability of the policy. Although the connection between politics and currency values ​​can be set to not to directly. There was no apparent change in policy when the financial crisis hit in recent days the Bush administration. This is more of the adequacy of certain policies that may affect the exchange rate. In any case, the large Chinese trade surplus is materialized in U.S. dollars, mainly in the form of Treasury bonds.

"We have lent a large sum of money in the U.S., of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I am definitely a little worried." The problem is that the Chinese can not make big sale of U.S. treasury bonds because it will lead to their price will fall. But even if they keep them massive U.S. subsidies will mean the U.S. government sells more bonds and the market may demand higher interest rates for them than the interest rates on Chinese bonds hold. This will result in a scenario of falling prices of bonds holding the Chinese. Alternatively, if the U.S. government chose to restrict borrowing and encouragement can mean a slower recovery of the U.S. economy will hurt Chinese exports to the United States. The second scenario involves reducing the trade deficit the United States because of the crisis has resulted in fewer Chinese purchases of U.S. bonds. In any case, the financial crisis facing the Chinese leaders with severe dilema.Američki sees the solution in encouraging domestic potrošnje.Kineska Chinese government sees the solution in reducing its reliance on its reserves to the U.S. dollar and the dependence on U.S. financial policy beyond its control, by calling (with Russia ) for the establishment of an internationally managed reserve currency, which will increase the stability of global financial markets and have the added benefit of greater freedom for the financial policy of the reserve currency policy like the U.S., EU and Japan.

2 What China expects the U.S.

budget deficit control
After the financial crisis and the implementation of incentive measures of primary care in China is the U.S. government's resolve and ability to budget deficit under control. From the perspective of China's national interest in their ability to deal with the negative effects of the global financial crisis depends on the value of their national reserves, which is dependent on U.S. policy. Commentators speculate on whether China will continue buying U.S. securities, thus financing the U.S. government potrošnje.Očigledan answer is yes, because there is no substitute for U.S. government bonds in terms of safe investments, even when taking into account all the pitfalls of using them as financial instruments rezervat.Logična an improvement in the trade balance between China and the United States will be that China will buy fewer U.S. securities because they will have less free funds used to purchase the bonds, but will use the money to profit from exports to the U.S. to pay for imports instead. To conclude, if China is financially viable option to switch to other reserves, a safe haven such as the IMF special drawing rights, or that the euro would do and they will not hesitate to do so if it becomes viable in the future. Current calculations even though the U.S. dollar attractive despite the contradictory position serves as an international currency, but held under U.S. national control. China will continue to maintain its national reserves in U.S. dollars and try to influence the American government to continue a policy that will prevent the dollar from losing value.

free trade not protectionism
The second most important economic statecraft policy question that China wants to see a positive outcome in their relations with the United States that the administration will go about dealing with protectionist pressures in Congress. China is understandably suspicious the real U.S. intentions. On the one hand, we have determined the statements of President Obama at the G20 meeting a few warning against the dangers of protectionism and other controversial imposition of tariffs on imported tires from China.

New U.S. financial regulation to prevent crises
China is concerned with the negative impact of the current financial crisis that has exposed their economic vulnerability to events beyond their control. Understandably, China wants to see better regulation to ensure the smooth functioning and predictability of the U.S. financial system of world trade depends on health.

The increased role of China in the IMF
At the 20th meeting of the International Monetary and Financial Committee of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund in Istanbul Deputy Governor Central Bank of China Yi Gang point for higher quotas for developing countries and better tracking abilities zaMeđunarodni Monetary Fund. He blamed the IMF for not foresee the global financial crisis and blames this failure on poor management resulting from the distorted representation in the IMF governing bodies. This is a valid complaint, such as the Chinese have done what is expected of them: efficiently produced goods for export and financial collapse adversely affect them, without warning. That the IMF has required structural and administrative reforms, including revision of quotas admitted supported by the U.S. government.

recognizing China as a market economy.
Recognition of China as a market economy affects the way the fair market value of the goods calculated to determine whether the country is participating in the subsidy or dumping. As China is not recognized as a market economy by major trading partners, U.S. and EU may be easier to apply sanctions against China in the latter case, U.S. tariffs on imported tires from China. Theoretically, the question has two strane.Prvi can China be considered a market economy? Prevalence of state-owned enterprises and the strict control of the national currency credits towards a negative answer. On the other hand, a significant development of China to establish an effective enterprise, including private ones successfully working on increasing export capacity points to the conclusion that China is making considerable efforts to implent sustav.Rezultati latest market-driven China -. American strategic dialogue shows that there are no insurmountable obstacles on the way to the U.S. recognition of China's market economy status, which will realize sooner or later, depending on the political situation in both countries

While the official Chinese policy can deal with the continuing dominance of the Communist Party and the Marxist ideology of the Russian (and Yugoslavia), experience shows that the true interests of the ruling elite may be more material than ideological alignment to maintain their economic moći.Metastaza corruption feed China's economic boom points int that direction Bearing this in mind, three scenarios can be discerned for the future development Kine.Najpoželjniji, but perhaps not likely to be gradual political development of Chinese society to democracy after the consolidation of market principles in gospodarstvu.Najopasniji will slip backwards under the pressure of economic coercion and oppression in the pugnacity of Mao ere.Najvjerojatniji although it will be a collapse of the Communist Party and the transfer of power in the hands of corrupt officials and mafia like structures. The U.S. initiative for democratic reform in China can diffuse the danger of chaotic collapse of communism and the significant security implications that may result. Finally we can conclude that there is a convergence of interests between the Chinese Communist Party, businesses and people in China and that leads to peaceful economic development as a way to solve all the problems facing modern China. This position may find understanding in the U.S. and the rest of the world as it is consistent with long-term interests of all countries interested in developing economic relations with China on a win-win basis.

Using Survival Tactics During Economic Trouble

Posted by naharazizi



If we continue to have economic problems in the future, and it gets worse, we should start to see more crime that we can push the survival tactics. People will be desperate to get money to pay for things and will begin to resort to theft. This will be done in the form of robberies in convenience stores, burglary and home invasion.

This is something we all need to be aware and be prepared for such we are not affected by this crime. Do you want to feel safe when going out or at home, and the last thing you want is to be caught in some type of criminal offense. If you've read about the Argentine economic problem in the early 2000's, you will see an increase in crime that is difficult to get out. You might be robbed on the road or your home was robbed while you were out.

People of Argentina had to take more drastic measures to protect themselves and their property. Many began to carry guns with them when they go out and set the house with steel doors and bars on windows to reduce the possibility of someone who is in. I hope we do not come to this and can continue our life safe.

But we still need to be aware that we could have increased crime and personally prepare our homes and ourselves for that. Look around your home to see what you can do that by far was the hiding place of a criminal could use. Are you sure your doors from being in the legs, if not to learn how you can strengthen. Add some outside security lights that have motion sensor. You can easily bypass the motion sensor with your light switch if you want to keep them on all night.

Be aware of your surroundings when you go out, so May to notice something that does not look good. If you feel uncomfortable to follow your instincts, you May be wrong, but at least you will take all necessary measures.

China’s Economic Growth and the Property Revolution

Posted by naharazizi



After joining the WTO in 2001, is still great. March 2007 is to be remembered as a great turning point for China. China government declared the legal protection of individual property, which is a big step forward for China's economic growth, which is based on decades of collective or public property.

Although rural areas are the old property of the legal system, the fact that the National Popular Assembly voted almost unanimously law private property revolutions, shows that China is becoming increasingly integrated into capitalism and the global economy. Premier Wen Jiabao are considered the property of the revolution as a "big jump" as a way to change from the days of instability and lack of productivity, the new order where the product quality and high productivity are obvezna.Financijsku situation in the state-owned enterprises and sagging contribution to employment has become a big concern the Chinese central government.

Since 1978, the Chinese economic growth, the Government of the People's Republic of China is reforming its economy from a Soviet-style centrally planned economy, market-oriented economy in the political framework of Communist Party of China. China's economic growth helps to bring down poverty levels from 53% in 1981 to less than 8% today. However, China's progress is still concentrated in the coastal and southern provinces, and efforts are made to expand the internal prosperity of the provinces and the industrial Northeast. Foreign trade and investment to help increase the level of income, consumption and produktivnost.Vlada is focusing on foreign trade as a way to promote China's economic growth. China's economic growth is so strong, that is the first in the consumption of aluminum, steel, copper and coal and the second largest consumer of oil in the world. With cheap labor more than 800 million workers, China's economic growth potential is enormous. Compared with developed countries, China lags behind in science, technology, management, environmental protection of the environment, quality education and organizational levels. Entry into the World Trade Organization is paying off for China's economic growth and foreign direct investment is surging.

With China's economic growth rate was over 10%, while export growth at a steady pace, the future is promising for a new member of the capitalist club. Although there are many countries feel threatened by China, we must admit that there is a major new opportunity to open doors for industrial and commercial investors worldwide.